Neuro · Document Accessibility

Every document, accessible to everyone

Document Accessibility reads a PowerPoint or PDF the way an auditor would, every image, every reading path, every contrast ratio, then writes the fix. WCAG 2.2 AA remediation and a per-file compliance report, at the speed of a batch job, not a manual pass.

Try the live demo → Get in touch
Quick answer

Document Accessibility audits and repairs document libraries against WCAG 2.2. It generates real alt text rather than filenames, fixes reading order, flags contrast failures, and processes whole PowerPoint and PDF libraries in batch with a per-file report for the compliance team.

Capabilities

Audit. Remediate. Prove it.

WCAG audit

Every issue, scored and referenced

Upload a file and get back a score, not a guess. Every finding is checked against a specific WCAG 2.2 success criterion, so your team knows exactly what failed and why.

  • A compliance score before and after remediation
  • Every issue tagged to its WCAG 2.2 success criterion
  • Reading order, contrast and tagging checked together
Alt text at scale

Descriptive text for every image, automatically

Each image gets alt text that describes what actually matters in context, plus a long description for complex charts and diagrams, checked against WCAG guidance before it ships.

  • Context-aware alt text, not generic captions
  • Long descriptions generated for charts and diagrams
  • Every draft validated for length and clarity before export
Batch pipelines

Whole libraries, not one file at a time

In production this runs against entire PPTX and PDF libraries, hundreds of files queued in one pass, with low-confidence fixes routed to a person instead of applied blind.

  • Hundreds of files queued and remediated in one run
  • Human-in-the-loop review for anything low-confidence
  • Progress and results tracked per file across the run
Provable compliance

The paper trail the EAA and ADA ask for

The European Accessibility Act and ADA don't just expect accessible documents, they expect proof. Every remediation produces a report that ties each fix to the rule it satisfies.

  • Audit-ready reports generated per file, automatically
  • Every fix tied to the WCAG rule it satisfies
  • Built for EAA, ADA and Section 508 review
A single file's journey

Watch one document go from 54 to 98

The annual report arrives flagged on four criteria: missing alt text, low contrast, a vague heading and broken reading order. Minutes later it leaves scored, fixed and ready to publish, with the paper trail already written.

  • Every flag tagged to its WCAG 2.2 success criterion
  • The before and after score lands straight in the audit file
480 files, one deadline

The June deadline becomes an afternoon

Point it at the whole customer library and every statement, guide and form is scanned, fixed and re-scored in one run. The judgment calls, scanned pages and dense charts, are routed to a person instead of guessed at.

  • 466 of 480 files fixed without a human opening one
  • Ambiguous fixes flagged for review, never applied blind
63 charts, zero captions rewritten by hand

Alt text that actually describes the chart

Ask it to write alt text for every chart in the annual report and it reads each figure's data and caption first, then drafts a description that carries the point of the chart, not "image of graph". Sixty-three figures, one pass, every draft logged.

  • Each description written from the figure's data, in context
  • Applied to the file and logged, ready for review
Same file, one pass

One patient guide, before and after

The patient guide goes in failing on alt text, contrast, headings and untagged tables, and comes out of a single remediation pass with all four repaired, nothing hand-fixed in between. Open both versions side by side and the difference reads for itself.

  • Every failing check on the way in, repaired on the way out
  • No manual touch-ups between upload and export
Answers with receipts

Ask which files are compliant, get a citation

the clinic network asks whether the discharge pack is compliant, what failed on the annual report, and which files still block the audit. Every answer cites the remediation log it came from, never a guess.

  • Answers cite the audit record, file by file
  • The review queue is a question away, not a meeting away
The standards wall

Six rulebooks, one remediation pass

The EAA and rising ADA litigation turned inaccessible documents into legal exposure. These are the standards your documents get held against, and what each one actually demands.

WCAG 2.2 AA The baseline

The success criteria every other rule points at: alt text, contrast, headings, reading order and keyboard-navigable structure.

ADA Title II / III The US mandate

US public bodies and businesses open to the public must make their digital documents usable by people with disabilities.

Section 508 US federal

Anything bought, built or published by a US federal agency has to meet accessibility standards, training decks included.

EN 301 549 The European spec

The technical standard EU law points to. It folds WCAG into public procurement, so non-compliant documents lose you bids.

EAA The new deadline

The European Accessibility Act pulls customer-facing documents of private companies into scope: statements, contracts, manuals.

PDF/UA The file format

The ISO standard for how an accessible PDF is built on the inside: tags, reading order and metadata a screen reader can follow.

Proof you can open

Before and after, same file

The report ships with the fix

Not just a fixed file, a defensible one

Manual remediation runs $10 to $25 a page and leaves no record of what changed. Here, every remediated document exports with a fix-by-fix audit report attached: what was wrong, where, which WCAG criterion it violated, and what the fix was. When the auditor asks, you open the report, not an investigation.

  • Before and after score on the report's first page
  • Each fix mapped to the success criterion it satisfies
  • Human-reviewed fixes marked with the reviewer's sign-off
Before · annual-report.pdf · score 54
2.4.6 · vague heading
1.1.1 · no alt text
1.4.3 · low contrast
1.3.2 · reading order
After · annual-report.pdf · score 98
98
alt text · 118 chars · validated
audit report attached
The path

From backlog to evidence in four moves

STEP 01

Scan the whole archive

Every PPTX and PDF is scored against WCAG 2.2, ADA and EAA in one pass, so the backlog becomes a number instead of a fear.

STEP 02

Fix what is safe to fix

Alt text, contrast, headings, tags and reading order are repaired automatically wherever confidence is high.

STEP 03

Flag what needs a human

Scanned pages and complex charts route to a reviewer with the context attached. Nothing is applied blind to a file with your name on it.

STEP 04

File the evidence

Each file ships with a before and after score and a fix-by-fix report, mapped to the rule it satisfies, ready for the regulator.

Who uses it

Every team that publishes, covered

Compliance & Legal

A documented remediation trail across the whole library, before a complaint arrives, not after.

Communications

Decks and reports that reach every audience, without a manual accessibility pass on every release.

HR & Training

Onboarding and training materials that meet Section 508 and ADA requirements by default.

Public Sector

European Accessibility Act and public-procurement obligations met at the speed public services move.

Ready for your industry

Accessible documents across seven industries

Works with
Try it in this industry →

See 60 slides get fixed in minutes

The live demo scans a real investor deck, generates the fixes and exports a compliance report, watch the whole pipeline run.

Try the live demo → Get in touch