Departments · Legal

Precedent at your fingertips, privilege intact

Conflicts cleared in minutes, deal terms quoted from the live draft, client documents that survive accessibility review, and ethical walls that hold even against the AI.

Try Neuro Search live → Talk to us
Quick answer

AI in a law firm has to respect the wall before it is useful. Neuro sweeps conflicts across matters and affiliates, quotes clauses verbatim from the current draft with the version named, prepares accessible client documents, and refuses screened matters rather than answering around them.

Daily work

What a law firm runs on Neuro

Clear conflicts before the client hangs up

Name the matter and every party, affiliate and director is swept against the conflicts database and closed-matter index, with any waiver flagged and its language already drafted.

Neuro SearchRun it live →

Pull the clause, not the whole agreement

Ask what indemnity cap the Meridian draft carries and get clause 8.3 quoted verbatim, with the draft version it came from named, instead of an afternoon inside a 90-page SPA.

Neuro SearchRun it live →

Send clients documents that pass accessibility review

Courts bounce inaccessible e-filings and institutional clients now audit what their outside counsel sends. Letters, exhibits and filings get repaired in a batch, change log kept.

Document AccessibilityRun it live →

Walk into the partner call already briefed

A matter summary built from the data room, the correspondence and the latest turn of the draft, assembled in the minutes between the calendar reminder and the call itself.

Neuro SearchRun it live →

Know your deadline exposure 30 days out

Dockets and matter calendars swept in one pass, each date matched to its governing rule and ranked by what missing it would cost, statutory dates first.

Knowledge MinerSee the tool →

Ethical walls the AI cannot talk around

A screened associate who asks about matter 4471 gets a plain refusal citing the wall, and the attempt lands in the wall register, exactly as the screening memo intends.

Neuro SearchRun it live →
The whole board

Neuro across the practice

Use cases

Matters
Conflict checksMatter summaries Deadline exposurePrecedent lookups Engagement lettersFiling calendars
Documents
Clause extractionAccessible client docs Brief summarizationDefined-terms checks Redline notesExhibit indexing
The practice
CLE trackingPractice analytics Intake triageBilling narrative drafts

AI for legal

Neuro modules
Neuro SearchDocument Accessibility Knowledge Miner
Capabilities
Clause-quoted answersMatter-aware context Says not in sourcesWalls between matters Bulk doc remediationAnomaly alerts
Safeguards
Privilege respectedEthical walls enforced Access loggedNo training on client data

Connects with

Documents & knowledge
Comms
Your systems
Cleared to act

The conflict check finishes before the coffee cools

Name the matter and every party, affiliate and named director gets swept against the conflicts database and the closed-matter index, and the memo tells you the one prior engagement that needs a waiver.

  • Nine entities screened, one waiver surfaced, nothing buried
  • Waiver language arrives drafted, ready for partner review
Ask the file room

Deal terms and precedents, quoted back on request

What did we agree, what do we usually agree, and who is allowed to look: three questions, three sourced answers, and on the last one the ethical wall holds.

  • Answers quote the clause and name the draft version it sits in
  • Screened lawyers stay screened, and the refusal goes in the wall register
Filed and readable

Client deliverables that clear the accessibility bar

Courts reject inaccessible e-filings and institutional clients audit what their counsel sends. A client letter goes from 63 to 98 in one pass, exhibits included, with the change log kept.

  • Letters, exhibits and filings repaired together, not page by page
  • Each repair labeled with the WCAG rule behind it
The bank remembers

The right precedent surfaces itself, clause ready to paste

Ask for the firm's strongest change-of-control language and the precedent bank is searched, ranked by deal similarity, and the winning clause arrives quoted, with the matter it came from named.

  • Ranked by how closely the source deal matches yours, not by keyword luck
  • The clause comes extracted and quoted, not buried on page 47
Read the fight first

Redlines triaged before the first read-through

The counterparty's indemnity draft lands and every departure from the firm template is laid out side by side, so the negotiation starts at the uncapped liability, not at page one.

  • Every changed term lined up against the firm standard it replaced
  • A verdict that names what to push back on first
Matter lifecycle

A matter, minute one to close

STEP 01

Intake triaged

The inquiry is sorted by practice group, urgency and likely fee band while it is still an email, then routed to the right partner with the facts attached.

STEP 02

Conflicts cleared

Parties, affiliates and directors screened in minutes, the waiver drafted where one is needed, and the engagement letter follows the same afternoon.

STEP 03

Drafting with precedent

The precedent bank supplies the firm's standard clauses, redline notes explain each departure, and defined terms stay consistent across the whole deal set.

STEP 04

Closed and archived, searchable

The closed matter feeds the precedent bank and the conflicts index, so the next Meridian-sized deal starts smarter than this one did.

Live runs

Three asks, answered while you watch

Under the hood

The modules behind this page

Neuro Search

Matter-aware answers with the clause quoted, or a straight no when the sources are silent.

Open the tool →

Document Accessibility

Client letters, exhibits and filings brought up to standard in batches, log included.

Open the tool →

Knowledge Miner

Intake, utilization and deadline exposure turned into a board the partners actually read.

Open the tool →

Point it at your matter files

What you see here runs on fictional firms. In production, Neuro sits inside your matter system and your precedent bank, privilege respected, walls enforced, and nothing ever trained on client data.

Try Neuro Search → Get in touch